Earthling Theory: An Academic Introduction

Core Thesis and Theoretical Framework

Earthling Theory presents a fundamental reframing of human identity through the proposition that "Everything that makes us human has come to us, for better or worse, from the Earth." This perspective challenges not the exceptional nature of human intelligence (it is exceptional), but rather the widespread assumption that our intelligence emanates from some pregiven or innate human competency.

Earthling Theory reveals that our unprecedented cognitive capabilities have accumulated through our lineage of distinctive relationships with Earth's habitats. We are the only species to have developed intimate, sustained relationships with virtually every habitat on the planet, and each habitat contributed specific learnings that compounded into our current intelligence. To the degree that we are exceptional THIS is what makes us so.

This paradigm directly exposes a pervasive but unexamined contradiction in contemporary intellectual discourse. While virtually any natural scientist would readily acknowledge that human intelligence arose from purely natural evolutionary processes, the same thinkers consistently frame their discussions using language that positions humans as fundamentally separate from and superior to the natural world from which we emerged. This creates what could be termed "evolutionary amnesia"—intellectually accepting our Earth origins while linguistically and conceptually maintaining separation.

The distinction between synchronic and diachronic perspectives can be understood through a simple analogy: if a familiar idiom tells us that a picture is worth a thousand words, what profound insights emerge from the difference between a single photograph and a masterfully constructed film sequence? The photograph captures a moment—revealing what exists. The film reveals how that moment came to be—the accumulated story, relationships, and transformations that created the present instant. Similarly, synchronic analysis offers us a snapshot of human intelligence as it appears today, while diachronic understanding reveals the epic narrative of habitat relationships, environmental encounters, and Earth-collaboration that birthed our extraordinary capacities. When we employ only synchronic framing, we see human intelligence as an isolated achievement; when we embrace diachronic perspective, we recognize it as the culminating expression of billions of years of planetary creativity working through intimate relationships between consciousness and place.

In other words, the world is not as it is, it is the way it has come to be. This perspective brings with it an opportunity to participate in what the world may become.

This diachronic understanding naturally embeds the hallmark principles of the broader Oika framework: Deep Continuity (recognizing the unbroken ontological connection from cosmic evolution to personal human experience), Relational Creativity (understanding that nature's intelligence expresses itself through right-relationship rather than isolated entities), and Neurophenomenological Entanglement (recognizing how our evolved consciousness remains inextricably woven within the planetary processes that created it). Through this lens, human intelligence becomes not an escape from Earth's systems but their most intimate expression.

The contradiction is evident even among our most sophisticated contemporary thinkers. Steven Pinker's work exemplifies this pattern: while acknowledging evolutionary origins, his extensive discussions of human progress consistently employ language like "rising above human nature while accepting its influence is the essence of civilized behavior" and "our understanding of human nature should transcend fear and ideology." Such phrasing treats human nature as something to be overcome rather than as the accumulated gift of Earth-habitat relationships that enabled our unique capacities.

Sebastian Junger's Tribe (2016) provides an even more striking example of unconscious separationist assumptions. Junger writes that "humans have dragged a body with a long hominid history into an overfed, malnourished, sedentary, sunlight-deficient, sleep-deprived, competitive, inequitable, and socially-isolating environment with dire consequences." This framing portrays humans as victims of their own success who have somehow extracted themselves from natural systems, rather than recognizing that our current problems stem from forgetting our continued embeddedness within and dependence upon the Earth-habitat relationships that created our capabilities.

Yuval Noah Harari's Sapiens (2014) provides perhaps the most striking example of this unconscious contradiction. Harari frames human success around our unique capacity for storytelling, stating that "Homo sapiens rules the world because it is the only animal that can cooperate flexibly in large numbers" through "believing in common myths," yet never examines where this storytelling capacity itself originated. His analysis treats this ability as an innate human trait that appeared during the "Cognitive Revolution" around 70,000 years ago, describing it as "the point when history declared its independence from biology."

Similarly, Elizabeth Kolbert's The Sixth Extinction (2014) describes early human success by asserting that "man was a killer—to use the term of art an 'overkiller'—pretty much right from the start" and characterizes humans as having "the capacity to represent the world in signs and symbols [which] comes the capacity to change it, which, as it happens, is also the capacity to destroy it." Both framings treat human capabilities as essential properties rather than as accumulated results of Earth-habitat relationships, and interpret destructive behaviors as evidence of human dominance rather than as consequences of failing to understand our systematic interconnection with the environments that shaped our abilities.

This seemingly minor oversight carries profound consequences precisely because of the narrative power that these writers correctly identify as uniquely human. By employing their considerable storytelling abilities to validate, fortify, and perpetuate an assumption of separation, our most respected intellectuals are wielding the very capacity they celebrate to reinforce the paradigm that underlies our civilizational crisis. If our best and most respected storytellers are telling a story of humanity as an extractive and exploitative parasite on the Earth rather than as a planetary participant in the ever-creative and generative flow of Earth's innate intelligence, then it should be no wonder that we now act like the former. Earthling Theory proposes that the synchronic framing of human intelligence as self-generated rather than Earth-gifted perpetuates the existential disconnection that manifests as environmental destruction, social fragmentation, and the persistent inability to recognize ourselves as expressions of the planetary creativity that birthed us. Storytelling is as powerful as the stories we tell.

Theoretical Framework and Methodological Foundations

Earthling Theory draws on established knowledge within the natural sciences broadly and paleoanthropology specifically but reframes it by contextualization within the recent scholarship of Big History methodology (Christian, 2004; Spier, 2010), enactive neuroscience (Varela, Thompson & Rosch, 1991), and what philosopher David Ray Griffin terms "compound individuals" within process philosophy (Griffin, 1998). Drawing on Michael Polanyi's framework of tacit knowledge (Polanyi, 1958, 2009), it argues that authentic ecological relationship requires what Polanyi called "indwelling"—a form of embodied participation that transcends observational detachment.

Critically, Earthling Theory requires no addition of observable or measurable forces beyond those already recognized by established scientific frameworks. This reframing operates entirely within accepted concepts of evolutionary biology, developmental psychology, and ecological systems theory. What is required is simply a perspective shift from synchronic models that treat intelligence as an inherent human property to diachronic models that recognize intelligence as accumulated through millions of years of habitat-based learning. Rather than proposing alternative mechanisms, Earthling Theory suggests that consciousness transformation occurs through shifts in perspective that allow personal and collective identification with the relational origins of human cognitive capabilities that mainstream science already acknowledges.

The theoretical architecture of Earthling Theory rests on three integrated pillars: Deep Continuity (ontological continuity from cosmic to personal scales), Relational Creativity (nature's intelligence expressed through right-relationship), and Neurophenomenological Entanglement (how 1 & 2 leads to consciousness and transformation). This framework draws extensively from Varela's neurophenomenology (Varela, 1996) and Gregory Bateson's "ecology of mind" (Bateson, 1972), while incorporating recent advances in complexity science and systems theory.

Methodological Genesis: Contact Epistemology and Relational Knowledge Production

A crucial methodological consideration underlies Earthling Theory's development: its insights emerge through what could be termed "contact epistemology"—a philosophical framework examining how knowledge emerges through encounters and relationships including different way of knowing. Rather than arising from purely academic study, Human intelligence and Earthling Theory itself crystallized through decades of intimate contact with diverse ecosystems that enabled relational knowledge production across the boundaries between human and more-than-human intelligence systems.

This methodological approach aligns with a core contact epistemology principle that knowledge emerges from relationships and interactions rather than isolated reasoning. The theoretical insights developed through what anthropologist Tim Ingold calls "the dwelling perspective" (Ingold, 2000), where understanding arises through skilled engagement with environmental affordances rather than detached observation. Following the contact epistemological framework, these habitat encounters created conditions for knowledge emerging from lived, embodied relationship with the natural world through intimate communion rather than detached observation.

The coincidental nature of these habitat encounters—not planned as research but arising through life circumstances—exemplifies contact epistemology's emphasis on how transformative understanding occurs through authentic encounter rather than controlled study. This approach recognizes multiple valid knowledge systems (embodied, ecological, geological) and demonstrates how contact between human consciousness and Earth's habitat intelligence leads to new hybrid forms of understanding that transcend the limitations of purely anthropocentric frameworks.

Scientific and Philosophical Foundations

Paleontological Evidence and the Founding Moment

Central to Earthling Theory is the identification of a specific evolutionary pivot point approximately 7 million years ago, likely involving Sahelanthropus tchadensis or related early hominins. This "founding moment"— hypothetically conceptualized as sunlight reflecting off a red berry triggering a crucial behavioral shift—represents more than standard evolutionary adaptation. Following Lynn Margulis's work on symbiogenesis (Margulis, 1998) and Stuart Kauffman's theories of self-organization (Kauffman, 1995), this moment embodies what complexity theorists call an "emergent phase transition" where new systemic properties arise from relational interactions.

What followed was the literal encoding of planetary intelligence into human consciousness through specific mechanisms documented in both paleoanthropological evidence and personal experiential replication: phospholipid membrane intelligence as a precursor to discernment; a sophisticated progression of geological materials becoming incorporated into tool-making cognition that demonstrates the co-evolution of human intelligence with Earth's mineral intelligence; coastal environments encoding temporal rhythm recognition into neural architecture through tidal periodicities (Zilhão et al., 2010); and diverse soundscapes evolving sophisticated acoustic processing that enabled language and music (Fitch, 2010), for example.

The stone tool progression reveals particularly compelling evidence for this co-evolutionary intelligence development. Australopithecine use of volcanic rock as first tools initiated what archaeologist Dietrich Stout calls "embodied cognition" (Stout, 2011)—the physical collaboration between hand and stone that taught the fundamental storytelling intelligence of "if I do this, then this will happen." This mineral-neural partnership evolved through distinct technological stages, each encoding different cognitive capacities: Mousterian techniques developed aesthetic appreciation by requiring toolmakers to sacrifice functional utility for visual symmetry, demonstrating what archaeologist Steven Mithen identifies as the emergence of symbolic thought (Mithen, 1996); while Levallois methods encoded metaphorical thinking by requiring makers to "see one thing in terms of another"—envisioning the final tool within the raw stone core, a cognitive leap that primatologist Sue Savage-Rumbaugh argues represents the foundation of human language capacity (Savage-Rumbaugh & Fields, 2000). Recent neuroimaging studies confirm that Acheulean Levallois knapping activates the same brain regions involved in syntactic language processing (Stout et al., 2008), suggesting that Earth's geological materials literally taught humans the neural architecture necessary for complex communication.

This represents what archaeologist Steven Mithen calls "cognitive fluidity" (Mithen, 1996)—the integration of previously isolated cognitive domains through environmental engagement.

The hypothesis aligns with recent paleoanthropological findings suggesting that early hominin development was profoundly shaped by changing forest-savanna mosaics in the East African Rift Valley (Potts, 2012; Reed, 2008). However, Earthling Theory extends beyond adaptive explanations to propose that this moment initiated a qualitatively different relationship between hominins and their environment—one characterized by what phenomenologist Maurice Merleau-Ponty called "motor intentionality" (Merleau-Ponty, 1945/2012), an embodied engagement that would eventually enable humans to develop intimate relationships with every habitat on Earth.

Ontological Continuity and Systems Integration

The concept of Deep Continuity draws from both scientific cosmology and process philosophy to articulate what Alfred North Whitehead termed "the philosophy of organism" (Whitehead, 1929/1978). Recent developments in astrobiology (Cockell, 2014) and Earth system science (Steffen et al., 2004) support the view that life emerges from and remains embedded within larger cosmic processes, challenging Cartesian subject-object dualism that has dominated Western thought.

This continuity perspective finds empirical support in complexity science research demonstrating how information patterns propagate across scales—from quantum to cosmic (Kauffman, 2008; Holland, 1995). The framework resonates with indigenous cosmologies worldwide while remaining grounded in contemporary scientific understanding, particularly the emerging field of "biosemiotics" (Hoffmeyer, 2008) which studies how meaning-making occurs throughout living systems.

Methodological Innovation: From Knowledge to Lived Experience

Drawing on John Dewey's pragmatist epistemology (Dewey, 1934/2005) and phenomenological traditions, Earthling Theory emphasizes experiential engagement over purely conceptual understanding. However, this methodological commitment extends beyond theoretical preference to reflect the actual genesis of the theory's insights. The framework emerged not from library research but from what could be called "evolutionary reenactment"—inadvertently replicating through personal experience the habitat relationships that shaped human development.

This experiential foundation provides unique epistemic authority. As environmental philosopher David Abram notes in The Spell of the Sensuous (Abram, 1996), authentic ecological knowledge requires "sensuous participation" with the more-than-human world. The coincidental nature of these habitat encounters—from childhood immersion in glacial landscapes through adult engagement with marine and terrestrial ecosystems—created conditions where Earth's own "teaching" could impinge upon consciousness in ways that purely academic study cannot access.

The approach incorporates recent developments in "4E cognition"—embodied, embedded, enacted, and extended cognition (Clark & Chalmers, 1998; Thompson, 2007)—while recognizing that the theory's central insights arose through precisely these processes. This creates what philosopher Andy Clark calls "extended mind" (Clark, 2008), where the habitat itself becomes part of the cognitive apparatus generating theoretical understanding. The lived-experience foundation thus serves not merely as illustration but as primary evidence for Earthling Theory's claims about human-Earth continuity.

Implications for Identity Formation and Cultural Transformation

Personal Identity Reconstruction

Earthling Theory proposes that human identity formation has been profoundly compromised by what could be termed "ontological separation syndrome"—the widespread cultural belief that humans exist apart from rather than within natural systems. This separation creates what psychologist Peter Kahn calls "environmental generational amnesia" (Kahn, 2002), where each generation accepts diminished ecological relationship as normal.

Crucially, this theoretical framework emerged not from abstract speculation but from what contact epistemology would recognize as authentic encounter between human consciousness and Earth's teaching systems.

As detailed in "Experience and Big History" (Blundell, 2016), the insights underlying Earthling Theory crystallized through a life trajectory that inadvertently replicated humanity's evolutionary habitat relationships across multiple ecosystems. This biographical foundation represents what could be termed "embodied archaeology"—where personal ecological immersion serves as a microcosm of our species' developmental journey, revealing patterns invisible to purely conceptual approaches. The theory suggests that authentic human development requires what depth psychologist Bill Plotkin calls "soul initiation" (Plotkin, 2008)—encounters with otherness that reveal our fundamental continuity with Earth processes.

This proposition emerges from exemplary instances within the author's developmental trajectory: early childhood immersion in glacial outwash plains where sediments literally entered the body through wounds and breath, replicating the membrane permeability that first taught life the intelligence of discernment; extensive farm-based interspecies relationships where mammalian communication patterns (exemplified by Sarah the goat) demonstrated the same bioelectric networks that evolved from oceanic minerals (Bellono et al., 2017); decades of marine ecosystem engagement from commercial fishing through oceanographic research; and transformative encounters in East African savannas where early hominins first developed their Earthbound perspective.

The pivotal encounter with a dying bluefin tuna—whose sophisticated lateral line system capable of detecting electromagnetic fields and pressure differentials (Kalmijn, 1982) served as a cybernetic recognition moment—exemplifies how contact epistemology operates through embodied relationship rather than detached observation. This moment triggered fundamental life reorientation away from extractive relationships toward ecological integration, demonstrating how contact between human consciousness and more-than-human intelligence systems can generate transformative understanding.

Following contact epistemology's emphasis on knowledge emerging through relationship and encounter, this experiential foundation provides unique epistemic authority for understanding human-Earth continuity. The coincidental replication of humanity's evolutionary habitat trajectory through personal experience—encompassing coastal, terrestrial, marine, and savanna ecosystems that shaped human development—offers empirical insight into what contact epistemology terms "relational knowledge production" across the boundaries between human and Earth intelligence systems.

Collective Identity and Cultural Evolution

At collective scales, Earthling Theory proposes that cultural evolution has been shaped by varying degrees of human-Earth relationship maintenance. Cultures that preserved intimate ecological engagement—particularly indigenous societies—maintained what anthropologist Keith Basso calls "place-worlds" (Basso, 1996), integrated cosmologies where human meaning-making remains embedded within local ecological relationships.

The theory suggests that the current "metacrisis" (Vervaeke et al., 2021)—encompassing climate change, biodiversity loss, social fragmentation, and meaning-making difficulties—results from cultural-scale "Earth relationship disorder." This analysis draws on René Girard's work on mimetic desire (Girard, 1977) and Ernest Becker's insights into cultural symbol systems (Becker, 1973) to propose that consumer capitalism represents a maladaptive attempt to fill the meaning-vacuum created by ecological disconnection.

Transformation Pathways and Systemic Change

Earthling Theory proposes that individual transformation through ecological re-integration can propagate systemically through what cybernetics pioneer Gregory Bateson called "difference which makes a difference" (Bateson, 1972). Drawing on second-order cybernetics (von Foerster, 1981) and autopoietic systems theory (Maturana & Varela, 1980), the framework suggests that personal transformation in Earth-relationship can influence larger cultural patterns through what complexity theorists term "sensitive dependence" in complex adaptive systems.

This transformation pathway operates through what we might call "ontological modeling"—where individuals who have achieved authentic ecological integration become attractors for similar development in others. Critically, Earthling Theory requires no addition of observable or measurable forces beyond those already recognized by established scientific frameworks. The theory operates entirely within accepted concepts of distributed cognition (Hutchins, 1995), embodied cognition (Lakoff & Johnson, 1999), and ecological psychology (Gibson, 1979). What is required is simply a perspective shift from egocentric, localized models of intelligence toward ecological, distributed models that recognize intelligence as an emergent property of relational systems rather than an exclusive possession of individual brains.

This paradigmatic reframing does not require overturning reductionist or positivistic scientific paradigms—it merely extends their application to recognize what complexity theorist Stuart Kauffman calls "the adjacent possible" (Kauffman, 2000) in cognitive development. Rather than proposing alternative forces or mechanisms, Earthling Theory suggests that consciousness transformation occurs through shifts in perspective that allow individuals to recognize their embeddedness within larger intelligent systems that mainstream science already acknowledges. The process resembles what cognitive scientist Douglas Hofstadter describes as "strange loops" (Hofstadter, 2007)—recursive patterns where consciousness recognizes itself as both observer and participant in the systems it studies.

The theory proposes that sufficient numbers of individuals achieving ecological identity integration could precipitate what systems theorist Ervin Laszlo calls a "macroshift" (Laszlo, 2001)—a cultural-evolutionary transition toward what environmental philosopher David Korten terms "Earth Community" (Korten, 2006). This transition would involve restructuring economic, political, and social systems around principles of ecological integration rather than extraction and domination.

Contemporary Relevance and Research Directions

Earthling Theory addresses a fundamental cognitive blind spot in contemporary discourse: while virtually any natural scientist would acknowledge that human intelligence arose from purely natural evolutionary processes, persistent narratives throughout academic, intellectual, and popular expressions continue to frame humans as fundamentally separate from the natural world from which we emerged. This creates what environmental historian William Cronon calls "the trouble with wilderness" (Cronon, 1996)—a conceptual framework that positions humans as inherently extractive and antagonistic toward Earth systems rather than as participants in planetary processes.

The unconscious contradiction is so pervasive that even our most sophisticated thinkers maintain exceptionalist language while intellectually accepting evolutionary continuity. This linguistic and conceptual separation perpetuates what could be termed "evolutionary amnesia"—acknowledging our Earth origins while maintaining the separation paradigm that prevents us from acting like Earthlings. The prevailing identity narrative has effectively theorized human beings as separate from the natural systems that created us, contributing to what is now recognized as the Anthropocene crisis.

Earthling Theory proposes a fundamentally different identity narrative: humans as the accumulated expression of Earth-habitat relationships rather than as beings who transcended their natural origins. This reframing aligns with what systems biologist Lynn Margulis called "symbiogenetic thinking" (Margulis, 1998)—recognizing that evolutionary success emerges through collaboration and relationship rather than separation and domination. The theory suggests that humans evolved not as extractors from Earth's systems but as Earth's own mechanism for developing planetary awareness through intimate habitat relationships that no other species has achieved.

This identity transformation represents what philosopher of science Ian Hacking terms "dynamic nominalism" (Hacking, 1999)—the recognition that changing how we classify and understand human nature can fundamentally alter human possibilities. The shift from viewing intelligence as an inherent human property to understanding it as accumulated through Earth-habitat relationships constitutes what Thomas Kuhn would classify as a "paradigm shift" (Kuhn, 1962), not in scientific understanding but in the foundational stories through which human societies organize themselves.

The theory's emphasis on recognizing the relational origins of human intelligence provides practical guidance for educators, therapists, and cultural leaders seeking to facilitate authentic ecological integration. Its integration of scientific rigor with identity transformation offers a bridge between evolutionary understanding and ecological behavior, potentially enabling more effective responses to environmental challenges while fundamentally redefining the human role from planetary burden to planetary participant through habitat relationship.

Future research directions include empirical studies of how framing intelligence as relationally-derived versus inherently human affects environmental attitudes and behaviors, cross-cultural analysis of societies that maintain habitat-relationship narratives, and development of educational approaches that emphasize the diachronic rather than synchronic understanding of human capabilities. The framework also suggests new approaches to environmental communication and cultural transition that prioritize relational identity formation over purely informational approaches while fostering Earth-participant rather than Earth-separate human identity formation.

By positioning humans as Earth's evolving consciousness rather than its dominators, Earthling Theory offers both a diagnosis of our current civilizational predicament and a pathway toward what Thomas Berry called "the Great Work" (Berry, 1999) of creating mutually beneficial human-Earth relationships for the flourishing of life's entire community.

Bibliography

Abram, D. (1996). The Spell of the Sensuous: Perception and Language in a More-Than-Human World. Pantheon Books.

Bachelard, G. (1994). The Poetics of Space. Beacon Press. (Original work published 1964)

Bellono, N. W., Leitch, D. B., & Julius, D. (2017). Molecular basis of ancestral vertebrate electroreception. Nature, 543(7645), 391-396.

Blundell, R. (2016). Experience and Big History. In B. Rodrigue, L. Grinin, & A. Korotayev (Eds.), From Big Bang to Global Civilizations: A Big History Anthology, Volume III (pp. 230-255). Primus Books.

Deamer, D. (2017). The Role of Lipid Membranes in Life's Origin. Life, 7(1), 5.

Fitch, W. T. (2010). The Evolution of Language. Cambridge University Press.

Gibson, J. J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin.

Hofstadter, D. (2007). I Am a Strange Loop. Basic Books.

Cronon, W. (1996). The trouble with wilderness: Or, getting back to the wrong nature. Environmental History, 1(1), 7-28.

Ehrlich, P. R. (1968). The Population Bomb. Ballantine Books.

Hacking, I. (1999). The Social Construction of What? Harvard University Press.

Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.

Senge, P. M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. Doubleday.

Weisman, A. (2007). The World Without Us. St. Martin's Press.

Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia. Harvard University Press.

Kauffman, S. A. (2000). Investigations. Oxford University Press.

Lawrence, N. D. (2024). The Atomic Human: What Makes Us Unique in the Age of AI. PublicAffairs.

Tegmark, M. (2017). Life 3.0: Being Human in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Knopf.

Kalmijn, A. J. (1982). Electric and magnetic field detection in elasmobranch fishes. Science, 218(4575), 916-918.

Lenton, T. M., & Watson, A. J. (2011). Revolutions that Made the Earth. Oxford University Press.

Marean, C. W. (2010). Pinnacle Point Cave 13B (Western Cape Province, South Africa) in context: The Cape Floral kingdom, shellfish, and modern human origins. Journal of Human Evolution, 59(3-4), 425-443.

Mithen, S. (1996). The Prehistory of the Mind: The Cognitive Origins of Art, Religion and Science. Thames & Hudson.

Mora, C., Tittensor, D. P., Adl, S., Simpson, A. G., & Worm, B. (2008). How many species are there on Earth and in the ocean? PLoS Biology, 9(8), e1001127.

Sheldrake, R. (1988). The Presence of the Past: Morphic Resonance and the Habits of Nature. Times Books.

Stout, D., Passingham, R., Frith, C., Apel, J., & Chaminade, T. (2008). Technology, expertise and social cognition in human evolution. European Journal of Neuroscience, 33(7), 1328-1338.

Zilhão, J., Angelucci, D. E., Badal-García, E., d'Errico, F., Daniel, F., Dayet, L., ... & Zapata, J. (2010). Symbolic use of marine shells and mineral pigments by Iberian Neandertals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(3), 1023-1028.

Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an Ecology of Mind. University of Chicago Press.

Becker, E. (1973). The Denial of Death. Free Press.

Berry, T. (1999). The Great Work: Our Way into the Future. Bell Tower.

Capaldi, C. A., Dopko, R. L., & Zelenski, J. M. (2014). The relationship between nature connectedness and happiness: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 976.

Christian, D. (2004). Maps of Time: An Introduction to Big History. University of California Press.

Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension. Oxford University Press.

Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7-19.

Cockell, C. S. (2014). Astrobiology and the Ethics of New Science. Astrobiology, 14(9), 721-727.

Damasio, A. (1999). The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness. Harcourt Brace.

Dewey, J. (2005). Art as Experience. Perigee Books. (Original work published 1934)

Diamond, J. (1997). Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies. W. W. Norton.

Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and Society. Norton. (Original work published 1950)

Girard, R. (1977). Violence and the Sacred. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Griffin, D. R. (1998). Unsnarling the World-Knot: Consciousness, Freedom, and the Mind-Body Problem. University of California Press.

Harari, Y. N. (2014). Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind. Harper.

Hoffmeyer, J. (2008). Biosemiotics: An Examination into the Signs of Life and the Life of Signs. University of Scranton Press.

Holland, J. H. (1995). Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity. Addison-Wesley.

Ingold, T. (2000). The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. Routledge.

Kahn, P. H. (2002). Children's affiliations with nature: Structure, development, and the problem of environmental generational amnesia. In P. H. Kahn & S. R. Kellert (Eds.), Children and Nature: Psychological, Sociocultural, and Evolutionary Investigations (pp. 93-116). MIT Press.

Kauffman, S. A. (1995). At Home in the Universe: The Search for Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity. Oxford University Press.

Kauffman, S. A. (2008). Reinventing the Sacred: A New View of Science, Reason, and Religion. Basic Books.

Kolbert, E. (2014). The Sixth Extinction: An Unnatural History. Henry Holt.

Korten, D. C. (2006). The Great Turning: From Empire to Earth Community. Berrett-Koehler.

Laszlo, E. (2001). Macroshift: Navigating the Transformation to a Sustainable World. Berrett-Koehler.

Macy, J., & Johnstone, C. (2012). Active Hope: How to Face the Mess We're in Without Going Crazy. New World Library.

Margulis, L. (1998). Symbiotic Planet: A New Look at Evolution. Basic Books.

Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1980). Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living. D. Reidel.

McAdams, D. P. (2011). The Stories We Live By: Personal Myths and the Making of the Self. Guilford Press.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (2012). Phenomenology of Perception. Routledge. (Original work published 1945)

Nisbet, E. K., & Zelenski, J. M. (2011). Underestimating nearby nature: Affective forecasting errors obscure the happy path to sustainability. Psychological Science, 22(9), 1101-1106.

Pinker, S. (2018). Enlightenment Now: The Case for Reason, Science, Humanism, and Progress. Viking.

Plotkin, B. (2008). Nature and the Human Soul: Cultivating Wholeness and Community in a Fragmented World. New World Library.

Plumwood, V. (2002). Environmental Culture: The Ecological Crisis of Reason. Routledge.

Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. University of Chicago Press.

Polanyi, M. (2009). The Tacit Dimension. University of Chicago Press.

Potts, R. (2012). Hominin evolution in settings of strong environmental variability. Quaternary Science Reviews, 73, 1-13.

Reed, K. E. (2008). Paleoecological patterns at the Hadar hominin site, Afar Regional State, Ethiopia. Journal of Human Evolution, 54(6), 743-768.

Sheldrake, R. (1988). The Presence of the Past: Morphic Resonance and the Habits of Nature. Times Books.

Snow, C. P. (2012). The Two Cultures. Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1959)

Spier, F. (2010). Big History and the Future of Humanity. Wiley-Blackwell.

Steffen, W., Sanderson, A., Tyson, P. D., Jäger, J., Matson, P. A., Moore III, B., ... & Wasson, R. J. (2004). Global Change and the Earth System: A Planet Under Pressure. Springer.

Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind. Harvard University Press.

Varela, F. J. (1996). Neurophenomenology: A methodological remedy for the hard problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 3(4), 330-349.

Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. MIT Press.

Vervaeke, J., Mastropietro, C., & Miscevic, F. (2021). Zombies in Western Culture: A Twenty-First Century Crisis. Open Book Publishers.

von Foerster, H. (1981). Observing Systems. Intersystems Publications.

Whitehead, A. N. (1978). Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology. Free Press. (Original work published 1929)